KUALA LUMPUR: Moody's Investors Service has assigned an A3 issuer rating to Malaysia Airports Holdings Berhad (MAHB), with a stable outlook.
This is the first time that Moody's has assigned a rating to MAHB.
In a statement Thursday, Feb 24, Moody's said MAHB's A3 rating combines (1) its standalone Baseline Credit Assessment of 8, which is equivalent to the Baa1 level under Moody's Global Rating Scale; and (2) high support that Moody's believes the government would provide in the event that extraordinary financial support is required.
This results in a one-notch uplift to the fundamental rating, it said.
"MAHB's fundamental credit strengths are mainly underpinned by its position as a close-to-monopoly airport operator in Malaysia, where there is a track record of strong passenger traffic growth," says Elizabeth Allen, a Moody's Vice President and Senior Credit Officer.
"The cumulative average passenger growth rate of the last 10 years was 5.8% and in 2010 it was 12.7%. This is driven by a strong domestic economy, an attractive tourism sector and the expansion of the low-cost carriers (LCCs), whose presence in Kuala Lumpur in particular has stimulated demand," says Allen.
Furthermore, MAHB operates under a favorable regulatory framework which aims to protect the commercial viability of the country's airports, while allowing the government to pursue the goals of its social policies, she said.
Moody's said that while the current operating agreements between MAHB and the government have only been in place since early 2009 and thus inhibit a short history, both parties are committed to adhering to it, and there are no reasons to expect any material changes to the established framework.
The rating is further supported by MAHB's modest degree of financial leverage, it said.
Moody's expects debt/EBITDA to measure around 3-4 times as MAHB undergoes the CONSTRUCTION [] of a new LCC terminal at Kuala Lumpur International Airport.
At this level, MAHB's credit metrics would still compare well with Moody's other rated airports globally, it said.
'Offsetting these strengths are the challenges faced by MAHB, including 1) the completion of the new LCC terminal on time and within budget, 2) the concentrated nature of its exposure to two local airlines, Malaysian Airlines System Berhad (unrated) and AirAsia Berhad (unrated); and 3) potential expansion into land development and more airport investments overseas.
'The stable outlook reflects anticipated steady passenger growth and incorporates the expectation that MAHB's credit metrics will weaken from their historical levels, but remain at levels appropriate for the rating,' it said.
Moody's said upward rating pressure was unlikely, given the rating is the same as that for the Government of Malaysia.
'On the other hand, downward rating pressure could emerge if 1) the rating of the Government of Malaysia is lowered; 2) there are aggressive acquisitions into non-airport related businesses; and 3) there is significantly higher-than-expected capex due to cost over-runs on existing projects, or the undertaking of new projects.
'Credit metrics that would point towards a downgrade include debt/EBITDA above 4-4.5 times,' it said.
This is the first time that Moody's has assigned a rating to MAHB.
In a statement Thursday, Feb 24, Moody's said MAHB's A3 rating combines (1) its standalone Baseline Credit Assessment of 8, which is equivalent to the Baa1 level under Moody's Global Rating Scale; and (2) high support that Moody's believes the government would provide in the event that extraordinary financial support is required.
This results in a one-notch uplift to the fundamental rating, it said.
"MAHB's fundamental credit strengths are mainly underpinned by its position as a close-to-monopoly airport operator in Malaysia, where there is a track record of strong passenger traffic growth," says Elizabeth Allen, a Moody's Vice President and Senior Credit Officer.
"The cumulative average passenger growth rate of the last 10 years was 5.8% and in 2010 it was 12.7%. This is driven by a strong domestic economy, an attractive tourism sector and the expansion of the low-cost carriers (LCCs), whose presence in Kuala Lumpur in particular has stimulated demand," says Allen.
Furthermore, MAHB operates under a favorable regulatory framework which aims to protect the commercial viability of the country's airports, while allowing the government to pursue the goals of its social policies, she said.
Moody's said that while the current operating agreements between MAHB and the government have only been in place since early 2009 and thus inhibit a short history, both parties are committed to adhering to it, and there are no reasons to expect any material changes to the established framework.
The rating is further supported by MAHB's modest degree of financial leverage, it said.
Moody's expects debt/EBITDA to measure around 3-4 times as MAHB undergoes the CONSTRUCTION [] of a new LCC terminal at Kuala Lumpur International Airport.
At this level, MAHB's credit metrics would still compare well with Moody's other rated airports globally, it said.
'Offsetting these strengths are the challenges faced by MAHB, including 1) the completion of the new LCC terminal on time and within budget, 2) the concentrated nature of its exposure to two local airlines, Malaysian Airlines System Berhad (unrated) and AirAsia Berhad (unrated); and 3) potential expansion into land development and more airport investments overseas.
'The stable outlook reflects anticipated steady passenger growth and incorporates the expectation that MAHB's credit metrics will weaken from their historical levels, but remain at levels appropriate for the rating,' it said.
Moody's said upward rating pressure was unlikely, given the rating is the same as that for the Government of Malaysia.
'On the other hand, downward rating pressure could emerge if 1) the rating of the Government of Malaysia is lowered; 2) there are aggressive acquisitions into non-airport related businesses; and 3) there is significantly higher-than-expected capex due to cost over-runs on existing projects, or the undertaking of new projects.
'Credit metrics that would point towards a downgrade include debt/EBITDA above 4-4.5 times,' it said.
No comments:
Post a Comment